1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 55 N.J.
  5. 55 N.J. Super. 295 (1959)
 

CITRO v. STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ETC.

55 N.J. Super. 295 (1959)

150 A.2d 678

ROSE MARY CITRO AND ALFONSO CITRO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 27, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sydney I. Turtz argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Cohen & Turtz, attorneys; Mr. Marvin Feingold on the brief).

Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys; Mr. Roger F. Lancaster, of counsel).

Before Judges PRICE, GOLDMANN and GAULKIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

By this appeal plaintiffs, in an action charging negligence and nuisance, seek to reverse a judgment of "no cause for action" entered on a jury verdict in the County Court. The judgment is challenged on the basis of alleged errors in the trial court's charge to the jury. Plaintiff Rose Mary Citro sought damages to compensate her for personal injuries alleged to have been received when she tripped and fell over...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases