ZEROBNICK v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER

No. 18235.

337 P.2d 11 (1959)

Albert Boomie ZEROBNICK, Plaintiff in Error, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

March 23, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zerobnick & Epstein, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

John C. Banks, City Atty., James P. McGruder, Asst. City Atty., Denver, for defendant in error.


FRANTZ, Justice.

Zerobnick stood before the Municipal Court of Denver accused of six violations of as many ordinances of the City and County of Denver. To these charges he entered pleas of "not guilty." On the issues thus joined he was tried. At the conclusion of the trial the court found him guilty of violating Sections 821.1 and 821.3, relating to gambling, and Section 824.1-1, defining one of the ways in which a person may be held to be a vagrant, all being sections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases