1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 8 A.D.2d
  5. 8 A.D.2d 333 (1959)
 

SIEGEL v. SIEGEL

8 A.D.2d 333 (1959)

Ruth Siegel, Respondent, v. Samuel W. Siegel, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 30, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Sumner Goldberg of counsel (Irving Hatterer with him on the brief; Goldberg & Hatterer, attorneys), for appellant.

Henry Shuman for respondent.

BREITEL, J. P., RABIN, M. M. FRANK, McNALLY and STEVENS, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order which confirms the report of the Referee, punishes the defendant for contempt, and denies a cross motion for a reduction of alimony. The record amply justifies the confirmation of the Referee's report and the denial of the defendant's cross motion for a reduction of the alimony award.

The proceedings were initiated by an order to show cause seeking to punish the defendant for his failure to pay alimony for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases