1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Utah
  4. 9 Utah
  5. 9 Utah 2d 324 (1959)
 

CURRENT CREEK IRRIGATION CO. v. ANDREWS

No. 8745.

9 Utah 2d 324 (1959)

344 P.2d 528

CURRENT CREEK IRRIGATION CO., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. ORVILLE ANDREWS, DEFENDANT, RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT. ORVILLE ANDREWS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. CURRENT CREEK IRRIGATION CO., A CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT. GERALD FOWKES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. CURRENT CREEK IRRIGATION CO., A CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Utah.

October 1, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clyde & Mecham, Salt Lake City, Robert B. Porter, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Carvel Mattsson, Richfield, E.J. Skeen, Salt Lake City, Christenson, Novak & Paulson, Provo, for respondents.

WADE, Justice.

Three cases are consolidated involving claims to water rights in various wells and springs in an underground water basin near Mona, Juab County, Utah. It is unnecessary at this point to detail the claims and counterclaims, appeals and cross-appeals. The position of the parties on the issues involved will be apparent. We group them according to their interests, and refer to them as Andrews (Orville Andrews, et al.), Fowkes (Gerald Fowkes, et al.), Current...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases