1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 174 Cal.App.2d
  5. 174 Cal.App.2d 158 (1959)
 

HILDEBRAND v. STONECREST CORP.

Docket No. 18207.

174 Cal.App.2d 158 (1959)

344 P.2d 378

NEIL F. HILDEBRAND et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STONECREST CORPORATION (a Corporation), Defendant and Respondent; KING'S MARKET (a Partnership) et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 30, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Leuenberger, Leuenberger & Feldman and Herbert Chamberlin for Appellants.

Marvin G. Giometti and Arguello, Giometti & McCarthy for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Young, Rabinowitz & Chouteau and Walter C. Chouteau for Defendant and Respondent.

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Plaintiffs Neil and Grace Hildebrand own and operate the Broadmoor Pharmacy in a shopping area called the Broadmoor Shopping Center, at premises leased from defendant Stonecrest Corporation "for the purpose of conducting ... a drug store and for no other purpose," the lessee agreeing not to use or permit the demised premises to be used for any other purpose.1 The defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases