1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 7 Wis.2d
  5. 7 Wis.2d 308 (1959)
 

STATE HIGHWAY COMM. v. GRANT

7 Wis.2d 308 (1959)

STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GRANT and wife, Defendants and Respondents: CRONIN, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by John T. Roethe and Thronson, Roethe & Agnew, all of Edgerton, and oral argument by John T. Roethe.

For the respondent State Highway Commission there was a brief and oral argument by Howard H. Moss of Janesville, special counsel.

For the respondents Grant there was a brief by Schubring, Petersen, Sutherland & Axley of Madison, and oral argument by R. J. Sutherland.

BROADFOOT, J.

It is apparent from a reading of the record, from the petition and appeal filed, and from the briefs in this court, that Cronin's main objective throughout this proceeding has been to have a jury determination of the necessity of acquiring the lands in question. It has been his contention throughout that the lands are being acquired by the city of Janesville and that his constitutional rights have been violated because there has been no such jury determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases