1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 109 So.2d
  5. 109 So.2d 202 (1959)
 

MAULTSBY v. MAULTSBY

No. 799.

109 So.2d 202 (1959)

Leighler C. MAULTSBY, Appellant, v. Sue M. MAULTSBY, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Rehearing Denied February 20, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam E. Murrell & Sons, Orlando, for appellant.

Roth & Roth, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant primarily questions the alimony award. It is not made to appear that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. If it should develop that the alimony award imposes a hardship upon the appellant, then he has his remedy, under appropriate circumstances, for reduction as provided under section 65.15, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See also Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App. 1958, 104 So.2d 597. No error has been made to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases