BANKERS COMMERCIAL CORP. v. AM. HOME ASSUR. CO.


21 Misc.2d 282 (1959)

Bankers Commercial Corp., Appellant, v. American Home Assurance Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving G. Schleimer for appellant.

Zipser & Levitt (Sidney N. Zipser and Howard E. Levitt of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — STEUER, J. P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The Civil Practice Act does not provide for the situation where after the denial of a motion for summary judgment additional facts come to plaintiff's attention or a contention advanced can be defeated by conclusive proof. Undoubtedly the proper practice is to apply to the Judge who made the original decision for leave to reargue or renew. Were this practice available we would so direct. But the Judge so deciding is no longer on the Bench. Under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases