STATE v. TATE

No. 584.

111 S.E.2d 190 (1959)

251 N.C. 347

STATE v. Eugene TATE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin & Whitley, High Point, for defendant-appellant.

Malcolm B. Seawell, Atty. Gen., and Harry W. McGalliard, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


PER CURIAM.

All of defendant's assignments of error are to the charge of the court to the jury. The court's definition of the crime of larceny is in substantial accord with our decisions defining larceny. A careful reading of the charge in its entirety fails to show that the court implied or intimated an opinion in respect to the evidence. All of defendant's assignments of error have been carefully considered, and are overruled. Defendant has failed to show prejudicial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases