MATTER OF BIEN


7 A.D.2d 293 (1959)

In the Matter of Maurice S. Bien (Admitted as Morris Bien), an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 24, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank H. Gordon for petitioner.

Harold Riegelman of counsel (H. H. Nordlinger with him on the brief; Nordlinger, Riegelman, Benetar & Charney, attorneys), for respondent.

BOTEIN, P. J., VALENTE, McNALLY, STEVENS and BERGAN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Respondent has admitted that in representing taxicab companies as attorney in connection with property damage claims, he submitted some 15 identical claims, supported by identical itemizations of repairs in cases where the damage was substantially similar. These claims were also incorporated in verified bills of particulars. Respondent states that he adopted this practice because of difficulty in obtaining estimates of repairs from taxicab companies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases