NADLER v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION


154 A.2d 146 (1959)

Louis S. NADLER, Sophie G. Nadler, Harry Krieger, Pearl S. Krieger, Rose S. Golomb, Molly Golomb and Eva Myra Epstein, Plaintiffs, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Donald T. Aikenhead, James P. Bender, Norborne Berkeley, Frank R. Brugler, Stewart J. Cort, Harry C. Crawford, Eugene G. Grace, Keenan L. Griffith, Arthur B. Homer, Jesse V. Honeycutt, Paul S. Killian, Joseph M. Larkin, Robert E. McMath, Arthur F. Peterson, Daniel D. Strohmeier, Russell K. Branscom, Bernard D. Broeker, Paul B. Entrekin, Francis M. Huffman, William H. Johnstone, Ivor D. Sims, Edmund F. Martin and Talbot Shelton, Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

On Reargument September 16, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Taylor, Jr., Wilmington, and Nathan B. Kogan, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Robert H. Richards, Jr. (of Richards, Layton & Finger), Wilmington and Albert R. Connelly (of Cravath, Swaine & Moore), New York City, for defendants.

Joseph T. Walsh (of Logan, Marvel, Boggs & Theisen), Wilmington, and Mortimer A. Shapiro, New York City, for objectants, Henry Schwartz and Dorothy Schwartz.

Abraham Hoffman, Wilmington, and Abraham I. Markowitz, New York City, for objectant, Jerome G. Rose.

Irving Morris (of Cohen & Morris), Wilmington, and Martin Horwitz, New York City, for objectants, Shirley Krieger and Benjamin Richland.

Irwin M. Taylor (of Kaufman, Taylor & Kimmel), New York City, for objectant, Irving Miller.


MARVEL, Vice Chancellor.

The complaint1 in this case, as amended on September 27, 1957, charged the individual defendants with breaches of fiduciary duty as directors and officers of the corporate defendant or of its subsidiaries in allegedly causing excessive corporate salaries and other forms of compensation to be paid to themselves and other employees of Bethlehem during the years 1954 through 1956. While plaintiffs' attack is directed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases