Per Curiam.
There is positive testimony by the defendant that the only amount he ever owed the plaintiff wife was $275, and that he had never authorized her to insert in the note an amount in excess of that. Plaintiff wife, on the other hand, testified that, in addition to the $275, she and her husband had loaned the defendant other amounts on other occasions. There is a definite conflict in the testimony as to whether the note was blank as to the name of payee...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
