1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 6 Wis.2d
  5. 6 Wis.2d 285 (1959)
 

SAGER v. HANNEMANN

6 Wis.2d 285 (1959)

SAGER, Executor, Appellant, v. HANNEMANN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 3, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Hoeffel & Coughlin, attorneys, and Byrne, Bubolz & Spanagel of counsel, all of Appleton, and oral argument by Harry P. Hoeffel and Gordon A. Bubolz.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Bradford & Gabert of Appleton.

DIETERICH, J.

The court in its decision on motions after verdict stated as follows:

"It is recognized that the verdict is advisory only to the court, and the court may adopt or reject it.

"The issues of fact in this case were highly controverted and strenuously contested.

"The court frankly states that its decision on the payment would have differed from the jury's finding ... if that matter had been left to its decision. However, a jury submission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases