1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 264 F.2d
  5. 264 F.2d 24 (1959)
 

SPRINGER v. BEST

No. 15897.

264 F.2d 24 (1959)

Curtis H. SPRINGER, Appellant, v. May BEST et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 18, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Curtis H. Springer, Baker, Cal., for appellant, in pro. per.

Paul Hill, Max L. Herzig, Hollywood, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents an incredible and almost impossible "record" for a reviewing court. Appellant Springer, though constantly urged to employ legal counsel, appears in propria persona. Appellee May Best, though repeatedly urged to employ legal counsel, appears in propria persona. Appellee Albright appears by attorneys Herzig and Hill, as do the three appellee minors, Lolly, Dolly and Tommy Best. One of the attorneys, Max L. Herzig states, seeking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases