1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 191 Pa.Super.
  5. 191 Pa.Super. 91 (1959)
 

TITCOMB UNEMPL. COMPENSATION CASE

191 Pa.Super. 91 (1959)

Titcomb Unemployment Compensation Case. Philadelphia Transportation Company, Appellant, v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

November 11, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Platten, with him Edward G. Bauer, Jr., and Hamilton C. Connor, Jr., and Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, for employer, appellant.

Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board, appellee.

Stanley M. Greenberg, with him Ochman and Greenberg, for claimant, intervening appellee.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, ERVIN, and WATKINS, JJ. (GUNTHER, J., absent).

OPINION BY WATKINS, J., November 11, 1959:

In this unemployment compensation case benefits were granted to the claimant on the ground that there was no competent testimony in the record to substantiate the company's allegation that the claimant violated fare regulations and so was guilty of willful misconduct under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS § 802(e). The Bureau of Employment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases