HANSON, J. pro tem.
The controlling question in this case, as we view it, is whether the trial court correctly interpreted the meaning of the language italicized in paragraph 6 of the contract (set forth below) entered into by and between Semas on the one side and Bogdanich Construction Company and Bogdanich Building Company on the other.
The trial court found that Semas, through weekly advances, had been overpaid the sum of ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.