1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 189 Pa.Super.
  5. 189 Pa.Super. 91 (1959)
 

PHILA. TAX REV. BD. v. NORTON, LILLY & CO.

189 Pa.Super. 91 (1959)

Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. Norton, Lilly & Co., Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 20, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Brodhead, with him Ralph C. Evert, J. Welles Henderson, and Rawle & Henderson, for appellant.

Leonard B. Rosenthal, Assistant City Solicitor, with him James L.J. Pie, Assistant City Solicitor, and David Berger, City Solicitor, for appellee.

Before RHODES, P.J., GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, ERVIN, and WATKINS. JJ. (HIRT, J., absent).

OPINION BY WATKINS, J., March 20, 1959:

This appeal is taken from the action of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, dismissing exceptions taken by the appellant, Norton, Lilly & Co. to the findings of the tax review board of the City of Philadelphia. The board's opinion denied petitions for review of taxes assessed against the appellant by the department of collections of the City of Philadelphia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases