HAMMOND v. PENNA. R.R. CO.


31 N.J. 244 (1959)

156 A.2d 689

MARGARET HAMMOND, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO., NEW YORK & LONG BRANCH RAILROAD CO., AND P.S. WENTZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 21, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Eugene Capibianco argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. Stephen A. Argeris argued the cause for defendant-respondent, New York and Long Branch Railroad Company (Messrs. Hanlon, Argeris & Crahay, attorneys; Messrs. Wm. F. Hanlon and Stephen A. Argeris, of counsel).


The opinion of the court was delivered by WEINTRAUB, C.J.

The single question presented is whether illegitimate children are "children" within the meaning of the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51. Upon motion the complaint was dismissed. We certified the appeal before the Appellate Division acted upon it.

The complaint alleged the deceased John Hammond was survived by his five children...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases