1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. Super. 219 (1959)
 

BELOUSOFSKY v. BD. OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF LINDEN

54 N.J. Super. 219 (1959)

148 A.2d 632

IRVING BELOUSOFSKY, TRADING AS BLANCKE ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LINDEN, ETC., AND FELIX C. HEICK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 25, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stanley Tannenbaum argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Nathan Reibel, attorney).

Mr. Sam J. Abraham argued the cause for defendant-respondent the Board of Education (Messrs. Magner & Abraham, attorneys; Mr. Leo Kahn on the brief).

No appearance for defendant-respondent Felix C. Heick.

Before Judges SCHETTINO, HALL and GAULKIN.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in lieu of prerogative writ in which plaintiff seeks to compel the defendant board to accept his bid for lighting fixtures and electrical work, and to enjoin the acceptance of the bid of Heick. There was summary judgment against plaintiff and he appeals.

The specifications provided that "In all cases where fluorescent lighting fixtures are specified, they shall be Pittsburgh `Norwin,' 40 watt fixtures or Equal approved." The ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases