1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 175 F.Supp.
  5. 175 F.Supp. 96 (1959)
 

LANGDON v. SALTSER & WEINSIER, INC.

Civ. No. 12743.

175 F.Supp. 96 (1959)

Jesse D. LANGDON and Eureka Vacuum Breaker Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. SALTSER & WEINSIER, INC., Defendant, Sloan Valve Co., Intervener-Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York

June 24, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harris, Corwin & Post, New York City (Harry H. Harris, New York City, of counsel) and Munn, Liddy, Daniels & March, New York City (Arthur A. March, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City (Elmer R. Helferich, and Nicholas J. Stathis, New York City, of counsel) and Parker & Carter, Chicago, Ill. (Norman S. Parker, and James G. Staples, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for defendants.

ZAVATT, District Judge.

Because of the disposition prior to trial of all other claims, the suit in its present posture now embraces only a demand for damages for the alleged infringement of claim 2 of reissue patent No. 21,323 issued to the plaintiff Jesse D. Langdon on January 16, 1940. The original patent was granted on March 23, 1937, and, therefore, the reissue patent expired while this action was pending. The plaintiff Eureka Vacuum Breaker Corporation is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases