1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 169 Cal.App.2d
  5. 169 Cal.App.2d 97 (1959)
 

HIMMEL v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF BURLINGAME

Docket No. 17691.

169 Cal.App.2d 97 (1959)

336 P.2d 996

JAMES HIMMEL, as Trustee, etc., et al., Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 26, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Himmel, in pro. per., for Appellants.

Burress Karmel, City Attorney, for Respondents.

BRAY, J.

The notice of appeal states: "Plaintiffs are appealing all rulings, orders, and judgments, interlocutory or final, which in any way, or to any degree are adverse to the interests of the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action. Particular reference is made to proceedings in the above-entitled case of May 18, 1956 and March 16, 1956."*

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. May a corporation sue in propria persona?

2....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases