BIRNBAUM v. KATZ


18 Misc.2d 243 (1959)

Moe Birnbaum, Respondent, v. Leo Katz et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 26, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Rosenberg for appellants.

Mildred B. Lesser for respondent.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The order of March 13, 1959 should be affirmed, with $10 costs. No opinion.

The order of March 16, 1959 should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to the defendant Katz and the matter remitted to the Municipal Court to determine on oral proof whether defendant-appellant was served with process.

Defendant-appellant is entitled to a hearing to determine whether he was served...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases