1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 7 Wis.2d
  5. 7 Wis.2d 252 (1959)
 

MOLINARO v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

7 Wis.2d 252 (1959)

MOLINARO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Defendant: MILWAUKEE LIMESTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY and another, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by La France, Thompson, Greenquist, Evans & Dye, attorneys, and Alfred E. La France of counsel, all of Racine, and oral argument by Alfred E. La France.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Lucien J. Piery of Kenosha.

BROADFOOT, J.

Sec. 102.18, Stats., provides that after the hearing upon an application for workmen's compensation the commission shall make and file its findings upon all the facts involved in the controversy. The issues upon which findings of fact should have been made were as set up in the employer's answer. The examiner found that no injury occurred to the applicant. This was clearly in error. The applicant testified to an injury, a coemployee called as a witness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases