HERMAN v. 214 W. 39 ST. CORP.


18 Misc.2d 238 (1959)

Marilyn D. Herman, Respondent, v. 214 West 39 Street Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

June 16, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Segal and Alexander E. Rosenthal for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the action should be unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order granting plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to accept service of the complaint unanimously reversed upon the law and the facts, with $10 costs, and taxable disbursements to the defendant, and motion denied with leave to plaintiff, if she be so advised, to make a new application for this relief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases