1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 6 Wis.2d
  5. 6 Wis.2d 249 (1959)
 

YASULIS v. YASULIS

6 Wis.2d 249 (1959)

YASULIS, Appellant, v. YASULIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 3, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Lepp & Lepp of Kenosha, and oral argument by Burton Lepp.

For the respondent there was a brief by David L. Phillips, attorney, and Charles J. Richards of counsel, both of Kenosha, and oral argument by Mr. Richards.

MARTIN, C. J.

It is well established that:

"The division of property, in a case of this sort, is peculiarly a matter resting in the discretion of the trial court, subject to such rules as have been established by this court for guidance in respect to the matter. Therefore, the trial determination must prevail unless clearly characterized by mistake or some manifest error respecting the detail facts upon which it rests, or disregard of established guides, amounting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases