AMERLAY, INC. v. DIRECTOMAT, INC.


18 Misc.2d 235 (1959)

Amerlay, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Directomat, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

February 17, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Pivar and Adrienne E. Hofmann for defendant.

Beer, Richards, Lane, Haller & Buttenwieser (Ephraim S. London and Stephen A. Wise of counsel), for plaintiff.


FRANCIS X. CONLON, J.

Heretofore the defendant in this action moved to vacate a warrant of attachment or in the alternative to modify and decrease the amount attached and to increase the security. This motion was denied by order of this court, and a notice of appeal has been served from such denial. Thereafter the defendant moved by order to show cause to reargue the motion. It contends that the first cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases