1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 217 Or.
  5. 217 Or. 34 (1959)
 

BARBOUR v. SUCHY

217 Or. 34 (1959)

340 P.2d 951

BARBOUR v. SUCHY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 24, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy F. Hughes, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Hughes, Vershum & Hughes, Portland.

Thomas E. Cooney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Walter J. Cosgrave and Maguire, Shields, Morrison & Bailey, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN and MILLARD, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Vina S. Barbour, brought this action for wrongful attachment against the defendant, Mary E. Suchy, doing business as Acme Credit Bureau. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $500 general damages and $1,000 punitive damages and from the judgment based on said verdict, the defendant appeals.

Defendant's brief contains three assignments of error, none of which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases