POSKE v. MERGL

No. 35598.

169 Ohio St. 70 (1959)

POSKE, APPELLANT, v. MERGL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 1, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A. H. Dudnik, Mr. Fred Weisman and Mr. Otto Themann, for appellant.

Mr. James A. Chiara, for appellee.


STEWART, J.

The sole error assigned in this court is that "the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgment of the trial court for the reason that the granting of a new trial by the trial court was not an `abuse of discretion.'"

Plaintiff states that the question of law presented to us is, "Was the granting of a new trial to the plaintiff by the trial court a clear abuse of discretion which showed an unconscionable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases