WADE, Justice.
This is an appeal by Danny Glispy and James Hallam from convictions by a jury of rape.
They contend: (1) that the court committed prejudicial error in allowing the doctor who examined the prosecutrix, a 15-year-old girl, to testify that an examination showed that the girl's hymen had been recently torn and that the tears were fresh and still bleeding; and that a hymen which is intact normally indicates virginity. And (2) that the evidence was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
