BALTIMORE & OHIO R. CO. v. UNITED RAILROAD WKRS., ETC.


176 F.Supp. 53 (1959)

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED RAILROAD WORKERS DIVISION OF TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, in its own right and as representative of the United Railroad Workers of America, CIO, Local 1463 and its members, et al., Defendants. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Bush Terminal Railroad Company, the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARINE ENGINEERS' BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL NO. 33, AFL-CIO, in its own right and as representative of its members, et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 19, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman, New York City, Joseph P. Allen, Edward F. Butler, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Delson, Levin & Gordon, New York City, Ernest Fleischman, New York City, of counsel, for defendant, Railroad Marine Union.

O'Donnell & Schwartz, New York City, John F. O'Donnell, New York City, of counsel, for defendant, Transport Workers Union of America.

Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, Carl E. Newton, Robert Morten, John Howley, New York City, of counsel, for defendants, Bernard Kearns, John J. Murray and James P. Ambrose, individually and as officers of Local M-108 United Marine Workers, Division of Dist. 50.

Herman N. Rabson, New York City, for defendant, Associated Maritime Workers, Local No. 1, Masters, Mates and Pilots.

Marvin Schwartz, New York City, Betty H. Olchin, New York City, of counsel, for defendant, International Organization, Masters, Mates and Pilots.

Lee Pressman, New York City, Ned Phillips, New York City, of counsel, for Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'n, Local No. 33.

William J. Hannan, New York City, for United Marine Division, Local 337, National Maritime Union, AFL-CIO and certain named individuals.


FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff railroads are common carriers engaged in interstate commerce and coming into and serving the City and Port of New York. Defendants are alleged to be unions and officers of unions representing railroad employees in various crafts working on the fleets of tugboats operated by the respective railroads in and about New York harbor.

In action No. 147-119 plaintiffs sue for an injunction to restrain what is alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases