1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 219 Md.
  5. 219 Md. 1 (1959)
 

TUFTS v. POORE

[No. 99, September Term, 1958.]

219 Md. 1 (1959)

147 A.2d 717

TUFTS ET AL. v. POORE ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 23, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Crooks, with whom were J. Douglas Bradshaw, William A. Linthicum, Jr., and Bradshaw, Shearin, Redding & Thomas on the brief, for the appellants.

Lansdale G. Sasscer, Jr., with whom were Jerrold V. Powers and Sasscer, Clagett & Powers on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal by the defendants below, Nancy Narcissa Poore Tufts, individually and as executrix of the estate of Pearl Payseur Poore, and William O. Tufts, from a determination by the Circuit Court for Prince George's County, upon a verdict of the jury, that the codicil of Pearl Payseur Poore, dated July 3, 1955, was procured by fraud. The proceeding arose upon a caveat...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases