OPINION BY ERVIN, J., November 11, 1959:
The only question raised on this appeal is whether appellant was guilty of willful misconduct within the meaning of that phrase as used in § 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS § 802(e), when, after numerous warnings, he was discharged for being habitually tardy. The Bureau of Employment Security, the referee and the Board of Review all concluded that the appellant was ineligible to receive benefits...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.