1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 147 Conn.
  5. 147 Conn. 48 (1959)
 

BUXTON v. ULLMAN

147 Conn. 48 (1959)

C. LEE BUXTON v. ABRAHAM S. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEY PAUL POE ET AL. v. ABRAHAM S. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEY HAROLD HOE ET AL. v. ABRAHAM S. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEY JANE DOE v. ABRAHAM S. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEY

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 8, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine G. Roraback, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Raymond J. Cannon, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Albert L. Coles, attorney general, for the appellee (defendant) in each case.

BALDWIN, C. J., KING, MURPHY, MELLITZ and SHEA, JS.

BALDWIN, C. J.

The complaints in these four actions seek declaratory judgments as to the constitutionality of § 53-32 of the General Statutes, prohibiting the use of any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception, and § 54-196, prohibiting the counseling or abetting of such use.1 The plaintiff C. Lee Buxton is a licensed physician. The plaintiff Jane...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases