1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Utah
  4. 9 Utah
  5. 9 Utah 2d 184 (1959)
 

STANTON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. DAVIS

Nos. 8950, 8951.

9 Utah 2d 184 (1959)

341 P.2d 207

STANTON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, CONTINENTAL EMSCO COMPANY, A DIVISION OF YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. MARVIN DAVIS, JACK DAVIS, JEAN DAVIS AND JOAN PRESTON, PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF DAVIS OIL COMPANY, DEFENDANTS, APPELLANTS, AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 6, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy, Sterling D. Colton, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Adams, Peterson & Anderson, L. Robert Anderson, Monticello, Clinton D. Vernon, Salt Lake City, Anthony F. Zarlengo, Denver, Colo., for respondents.

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

This appeal raises questions as to whether certain services and materials are proper subjects to create liens on defendants' oil well after the prime contractor failed to pay for them.

Stanton Transportation Company sued to foreclose a lien for $12,229.14: $10,984.64 for transporting a drilling rig to the well site, and $1,244.50 for labor in erecting the rig thereon. The trial court held the lien to be valid as to the latter sum,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases