Per Curiam.
The facts are not in dispute, the defendant contending that the manner of the selection of the jury was in violation of section 385 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and that his counsel was unduly limited in the cross-examination of a witness.
The record discloses that the trial commenced on March 20, 1958 and that during the morning session the District Attorney examined 12 jurors and then stated: "The people are content at this time"...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
