OOSTERWYK v. MILWAUKEE


7 Wis.2d 160 (1959)

OOSTERWYK and another, Appellants, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 5, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Gerhardus Oosterwyk of Milwaukee, pro se.

For the respondent there was a brief by Walter J. Mattison, city attorney, and Peter M. Stupar, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Stupar.


MARTIN, C. J.

The only question involved on this appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that the lien of $1,500 was reasonable. Appellant Oosterwyk, acting as his own attorney, dealt with many matters in his brief and oral argument which are outside the record and can have no bearing on the decision in this case.

The razing of the appellants' buildings, out of which this action arises, was done by the town of Granville...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases