TRI CITY FUR FOODS v. AMMERMAN


7 Wis.2d 149 (1959)

TRI CITY FUR FOODS, INC., Appellant, v. AMMERMAN and another, Copartners, d/b/a CHASETOWN MINK RANCH, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 5, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Brazeau & Brazeau of Wisconsin Rapids, and Johns, Roraff, Pappas & Flaherty of La Crosse, and oral argument by Robert D. Johns.

For the respondents there was a brief by Wayne B. Schlintz of Viroqua, and Donovan, Gleiss, Goodman, Breitenfield & Gleiss of Sparta, and oral argument by Mr. L. J. Goodman and Mr. Schlintz.


BROWN, J.

Tri City first submits that the jury finding on question 1 is not supported by the evidence.

"It is the well-recognized rule that when a jury's findings are attacked, particularly when they have had the trial court's approval, our inquiry is limited to the issue whether there is any credible evidence that, under any reasonable view, supports such findings. With the rule in mind we consider that it is necessary to recite only the testimony which supports...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases