BEDROCK FOUNDATIONS, INC. v. GEO. H. BREWSTER & SON, INC.


31 N.J. 124 (1959)

155 A.2d 536

BEDROCK FOUNDATIONS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, AND SAUL T. GRAND (JOINT VENTURE), PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. GEO. H. BREWSTER & SON, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MORRIS GOODKIND, KARL T. THOMAS, CURTIS D. WELLER AND LAWRENCE PETERSEN, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 9, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John J. Breslin, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant and third-party plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys).

Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for third-party defendants-appellants (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Joseph Bigel argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Bruck and Bigel, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Law Division denied motions for summary judgment by the defendant Geo. H. Brewster & Son, Inc. and the third-party defendants Morris Goodkind et al. Their appeals, pursuant to leave, are now before this court.

In March 1955 the State Highway Department entered into a contract with the corporate defendant (Brewster) for certain construction on Route 42, Section 12-B, North-South Freeway, from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases