1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 335 P.2d
  5. 335 P.2d 1085 (1959)
 

WILSON v. MOORE

No. 38026.

335 P.2d 1085 (1959)

Herbert WILSON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Ruth MOORE, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heber Finch, Jr., R.E. Stephenson, Sapulpa, for plaintiffs in error.

Gordon L. Patten, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The dispute in these two consolidated actions concerns the boundary between the NE 1/4 and the NW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 16 North, Range 12 East, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Two actions to quiet title were originally instituted against the defendant in error Ruth Moore: one, No. 89172, by the owners of Lot 2, which is the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, of said section, Harold & Ruby Dye; and the other, No. 89171,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases