WILSON, Justice.
The principal question in this non-jury case is whether plaintiff must show how he acquired a food product containing a foreign substance which injured him, in order to sustain his judgment for damages under the implied warranty theory.
Although plaintiff alleged he purchased a "T-V Chicken Dinner" which was manufactured and distributed by appellant, at a retail store in Dallas, his proof extended only to showing that he had first seen the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
