WATSON v. PREWITT

No. A-7111.

320 S.W.2d 815 (1959)

M.V. WATSON, Petitioner, v. E.O. PREWITT, Guardian, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

February 4, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Renfro & Johnson, Dallas, for petitioner.

Spafford, Spafford, Freedman, Hamlin, Gay & Russell, Dallas, Warren Whitham, Dallas, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The Court of Civil Appeals sustained a point of error presented in that court by E.O. Prewitt, respondent here and appellant there, that the verdict of the jury and judgment of the trial court were so contrary to the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust. 317 S.W.2d 954. In doing so the Court of Civil Appeals acted under the rule of law which, as it stated it, imposed upon it the duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases