HERNANDEZ v. THE SS FLYING ARROW


181 F.Supp. 951 (1959)

Enrique Vega HERNANDEZ, Libelant, v. THE Steamship SS FLYING ARROW, her engines, boilers, etc., and Isbrandtsen Co., Inc., Respondents.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 23, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome Golenbock, New York City, for libelant in both cases, Donald S. Sherwood, New York City, of counsel.

Dougherty, Ryan & Mahoney, New York City, for respondents in both cases, Robert J. Giuffra, New York City, of counsel.


PALMIERI, District Judge.

Of respondent's three stated exceptions, only one, laches, was argued or briefed by respondent and this memorandum is limited thereto. In determining whether the exceptions should be sustained, the affidavits submitted by the parties, in amplification or contradiction of the facts stated in the libel, may not be considered. The exceptions must be tested against the face of the libel. The Sydfold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases