ARMSTRONG v. DOYLE


20 Misc.2d 1091 (1959)

John H. Armstrong, Plaintiff, v. John C. Doyle et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Hyman Gittleman et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders of Canadian Javelin Limited Similarly Situated, and on Behalf of the Said Canadian Javelin Limited, Plaintiffs, v. John C. Doyle et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) Sydelle Glass et al., Plaintiffs, v. John C. Doyle et al., Defendants. (Action No. 3.) Miriam J. Wolf, Plaintiff, v. John C. Doyle et al., Defendants. (Action No. 4.) Marion Langer, Plaintiff, v. Canadian Javelin Limited et al., Defendants. (Action No. 5.) Hy Garfinkel, Plaintiff, v. John C. Doyle et al., Defendants. (Action No. 6.) Salvatore Lauricella, Plaintiff, v. John C. Doyle et al., Defendants. (Action No. 7.) Raymond Brightman, a Stockholder of Canadian Javelin Limited, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated, and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, Plaintiff, v. Thomas E. Bradley et al., Defendants (Action No. 8.)

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

October 22, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham L. Pomerantz for Salvatore Lauricella, plaintiff. (Action No. 7.)

Gallop, Climenko & Gould (Milton S. Gould and Martin I. Shelton of counsel), for Canadian Javelin Ltd. (All actions.)

Morris J. Levy for Raymond Brightman, plaintiff. (Action No. 8.)

Martin Horwitz for Sydelle Glass and another, plaintiffs. (Action No. 3.)

Wolf, Popper, Ross, Wolf & Jones (Benedict Wolf of counsel), for Miriam J. Wolf, plaintiff. (Action No. 4.)

Roseman, Goldmark, Colin & Kaye (Ambrose Doskow and Lawrence R. Eno of counsel), for Hyman Gittleman and another, plaintiffs. (Action No. 2.)

Dublirer & Haydon (Charles Haydon of counsel), for Marion Langer, plaintiff. (Action No. 5.)

Milton Paulson for John N. Armstrong, plaintiff. (Action No. 1.)

Christy, Perkins & Christy (Arthur H. Christy of counsel), for John Doyle, defendant. (All actions.)

Diamond & Golomb (Irving L. Golomb of counsel), for Harold Le Broc and others, defendants.


HENRY CLAY GREENBERG, J.

The proposed order contains a provision for the appointment of a Referee to supervise all depositions to be taken in the consolidated stockholder derivative actions and in the corporation's own direct action for substantially the same relief. As noted in the opinion of the court, the question of the conduct of examinations before trial and the extent of participation therein by counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases