PETLOCK v. KICKHAFER


7 Wis.2d 102 (1959)

PETLOCK, Respondent, v. KICKHAFER and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 7, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Holden & Schlosser and John R. Holden and Arthur J. Olsen, all of Sheboygan, and oral argument by John R. Holden.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Henry P. Hughes of Oshkosh.


BROADFOOT, J.

The sole issue presented upon this appeal is whether or not the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial.

The defendant advances four reasons for stating that the trial court did abuse its discretion. First, it is contended that the trial court's decision is predicated on an improper interpretation of a fact and the failure to take into account the findings of the jury. In its memorandum decision the court referred to the hazard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases