1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 176 F.Supp.
  5. 176 F.Supp. 916 (1959)
 

DOW v. SHOE CORPORATION OF AMERICA

Civ. A. No. 2568.

176 F.Supp. 916 (1959)

John DOW, Plaintiff, v. SHOE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Mid-States Shoe Co., and Mid-States Shoe Co., d/b/a The House of Crosby Square, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. Illinois, S. D.

September 16, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barber & Barber, Springfield, Ill., and Wall & Ulbrich, Bloomington, Ill., for plaintiff.

Heyl, Royster & Voelker, Peoria, Ill., for defendants.

POOS, District Judge.

This cause was previously submitted to the Court upon the original complaint which complaint the Court held failed to state a cause of action. Thereupon the plaintiff, John Dow, filed an amended complaint in which the complaint, by Count III, alleged that at all times hereinafter mentioned defendant, Mid-States Shoe Company, was and is now a corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, doing business as the House...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases