SURGITUBE PRODUCTS CORP. v. SCHOLL MFG. CO.

No. 91, Docket 25106.

262 F.2d 824 (1959)

SURGITUBE PRODUCTS CORP. and Louis Hochman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHOLL MFG. CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided January 30, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanton T. Lawrence, Jr., New York (W. Brown Morton and Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stephen H. Philbin, New York City (Stephen G. Cox, Westfield, N. J., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before MEDINA, LUMBARD and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.

The outcome of the plaintiffs' appeal from the dismissal of their suit for patent infringement turns on whether there is invention in a bandage which is made by taking an open-ended tubular fabric, placing part of it over the member to be bandaged, twisting the fabric intermediate its ends and then retroverting it over the member to make a double thickness. We agree with Judge Dawson that this was not invention, 158 F.Supp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases