1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 182 F.Supp.
  5. 182 F.Supp. 897 (1959)
 

AMERICAN SMELT. & REFIN. CO. v. NAVIERA ANDES PERUANA, S.A.

182 F.Supp. 897 (1959)

AMERICAN SMELTING AND REFINING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NAVIERA ANDES PERUANA, S.A., San Rafael Compania Naviera, S.A., Orion Shipping and Trading Company, Inc., Ocean Liberties, Inc.; Maritime Overseas Corporation, Boyd, Weir and Sewell Incorporated, Seaboard Stevedoring Corporation, Companie Financiera Peruana, S.A., Parr-Richmond Terminal Company, Port of Seattle, Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Company, and Schirmer Stevedoring Company, Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for plaintiff.

Nelson, Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, for defendants San Rafael Compania Naviera, S. A., Orion Shipping & Trading Company, Inc., and Ocean Liberties, Inc., Maritime Overseas Corp.

Zock, Petrie, Sheneman & Reid, New York City, for defendant Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc.

Stapleton, Flynn & Lilly, New York City, for defendant Seaboard Stevedoring Corp.

Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, New York City, for defendant Companie Financiera Peruana, S. A.

Tompkins, Boal & McQuade, New York City, for defendant Parr-Richmond Terminal Co.

Hall, Henry, Oliver & McReavy, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Port of Seattle.

Melvin, Conlan, Harless & Mathewson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Co.

Lillick, Geary, Wheat, Adams & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., and Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City, for defendant Schirmer Stevedoring Co., Ltd.

RYAN, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before us on a series of motions made to the Court by plaintiff and defendants. Because of our disposition of the matter, it is only necessary to consider defendant Companie Financiera Peruana, S. A.'s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Plaintiff American Smelting and Refining Company instituted this action of interpleader and deposited with the Registry

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases