HARTFORD v. REGAL SHOE STORE


20 Misc.2d 1055 (1959)

Huntington Hartford, Doing Business as Huntington Hartford Enterprises, Landlord, v. Regal Shoe Store No. 162, Inc., Tenant.

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan.

October 30, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan (Simon H. Rifkind and Gilbert Lazarus of counsel), for landlord.

Joseph Mandell, Henry Ess, III, and Sidney Keats for tenant.


MAURICE WAHL, J.

The landlord herein seeks a final order claiming (a) that tenant's occupancy under a lease has been terminated by due notice in writing; (b) that the present structure is to be demolished and that a new structure is to be erected, viz.: an art museum, for which plans have been duly approved; (c) that the tenant's lease has come to an end and it holds over without the landlord's permission....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases