1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 168 F.Supp.
  5. 168 F.Supp. 880 (1959)
 

UNITED STATES v. MARYLAND & VIRGINIA MILK PRO. ASS'N

Civ. A. No. 4482-56.

168 F.Supp. 880 (1959)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA MILK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

January 14, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Saunders, Edna Lingreen, Joseph E. Waters and A. Duncan Whitaker, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Herbert A. Bergson, William J. Hughes, Jr., Daniel H. Margolis, Daniel J. Freed and Nicholas J. Chase, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

As has been heretofore indicated, the complaint in this civil action brought by the United States against Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers Ass'n, Inc., D.C., 167 F.Supp. 799, under the antitrust laws, is in effect divided into three separate claims for relief or causes of action.

At the first section of the trial, the Court upheld the defense of immunity to the first cause of action, in that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases