BLUMENTHAL v. MUNICIPAL CT, CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

Docket No. 23989.

176 Cal.App.2d 865 (1959)

1 Cal. Rptr. 757

HERMAN BLUMENTHAL, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

December 23, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ellis J. Horvitz for Petitioner.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel (Los Angeles), and Donald K. Byrne, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, and Arthur L. Martin, Deputy Attorney General, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.


SHEA, J. pro tem.*

Petitioner seeks to prohibit further proceedings in the respondent court. He challenges the constitutionality of the statute under which he is charged. After his motion to dismiss was denied by the municipal court, on June 18, 1959, he petitioned the superior court for a writ of prohibition. In that petition he raised the same issue that is presented in his petition before this court. The petition was denied by the superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases